Most law firms moved to secure their websites during the past few years, prodded by bar regulators, who worry that client communications might be intercepted, and marketers, who’ve heard that Google dings websites lacking an SSL certificate.
But have law firms done all they can to protect against phishing attacks?
Law firms and their clients are particularly suspectible to phishing exploits. Just like banks, law firms are trusted entities that handle sensitive financial and personal information. An email purporting to come from an attorney’s domain will prompt at least a few clients to let down their guard.
Among marketers, email authentication is a “best practice” at least. Among law firms, it should be a “must do.”
Tight writing is always appreciated, today more so than ever as mobile devices become the dominant venue for online content consumption. Small screens held by distracted, mobile readers present law bloggers with a significant writing challenge that can’t be met with technology alone.
This post offers a dozen strategies to help law bloggers communicate more effectively on mobile devices.
Privacy missteps can create crippling financial liabilities for a careless marketer. In the case of law firm marketers, the additional reputational fallout for being caught surreptitiously collecting and processing a client’s personal information could be catastrophic.
During last year’s LMA Philly 2016 Conference, one speaker threw out for consideration a “new” approach to automated online marketing.
It went something like this:
The reaction in the conference room was, roughly, “What a great idea.”
And I thought, “What a terrible idea.”
Therein lies the gap between marketers and lawyers.
Today, the Federal Trade Commission indicated where the federal government stands on this issue.
The FTC extracted a $2.2 million settlement from Vizio Inc., a television manufacturer that allegedly violated the FTC Act by selling television sets that tracked purchasers’ viewing habits without their informed consent. According to to the FTC, Vizio’s surreptitious tracking amounted to an unfair and deceptive trade practice, in violation of the FTC Act and New Jersey consumer protection laws.
From the FTC press statement:
The stipulated federal court order requires VIZIO to prominently disclose and obtain affirmative express consent for its data collection and sharing practices, and prohibits misrepresentations about the privacy, security, or confidentiality of consumer information they collect. It also requires the company to delete data collected before March 1, 2016, and to implement a comprehensive data privacy program and biennial assessments of that program.
The message here is clear. Personal privacy protections come into play whenever a marketer collects or processes personal information. Not only can privacy missteps create crippling financial liabilities for a careless marketer, but, in the case of law firm marketers, the additional reputational fallout for being caught surreptitiously collecting and processing a client’s personal information could be catastrophic.